Growing health and effectiveness

A blog centered around The Addington Method, leadership, culture, organizational clarity, faith issues, teams, Emotional Intelligence, personal growth, dysfunctional and healthy leaders, boards and governance, church boards, organizational and congregational cultures, staff alignment, intentional results and missions.

Friday, April 12, 2019

Four things most leaders do not know about their staff but could if they asked



The staff of an organization is a treasure trove of information for leaders although most leaders and supervisors do not take advantage of that information. This is because leaders and supervisors assume that they know information they don't and that can be a deadly mistake on several levels.

Here are the four things leaders don't know about their staff but can if they choose.

The happiness factor of their staff members
Why is it important to know this? Because unhappy staff eventually leave while happy staff stay. If you find out too late that a valuable staff member is not happy they are often already gone emotionally and often you find out when they give you their resignation.

Ironically, this is one of the easiest pieces of information to know about your staff. For years, I have asked staff what their happiness factor is on a scale of 1 to 10. If their answer is 8 or lower I will ask the follow up question: What would make it higher than it is? You may find out what frustrations they are dealing with, a personal issue you can pray about with them or the fact that they are bored in their responsibilities. A simple question that can give you significant information.

Barriers that staff face in their work
One of the fundamental responsibilities of supervisors is to remove barriers for their staff. These may be financial, organizational, uncooperative people or strategic. Yet, as leaders or supervisors, we often do not know what those barriers are. Unless we ask!

I often do staff audits - hour long conversations with staff of an organization where I ask this simple question. Often, when I report to the leadership what I found they are surprised by some of the barriers and are usually desirous of removing them. This simple question can give you information you would not know about as you assume all is well - and it gives you the opportunity to serve your staff in a very practical way by helping to remove barriers they face.

Unused potential of staff
We hire staff for a particular job but sometimes forget that they are growing and developing and often they see things they could do and would love a shot at it. In fact, it is not unusual when I do audits to discover staff who are not being used to their potential and are thinking of moving on because they are bored.

Anytime we can give staff an opportunity to do more or to tackle more difficult assignments we ought to do so. Engaged staff are happy staff while bored staff are unhappy. The simple question, are you being used to your fullest potential can open up an insightful conversation. And maybe keep a good staff member in your organization.

Ideas for doing work more effectively
Because leaders are often focused on the larger issues, they often don't know the processes that make up the day to day work flow for subordinate staff. Further, organizations easily continue to do work they way they have always done it when more efficient and effective options could save time and money. Those closest to the work flow are often aware of efficiencies that could be implemented but because they are not asked, they don't feel like they are empowered to share their ideas.

Asking what we could do better or more effectively is a simple way to spark ideas and conversation about lean practices and management. Usually there is low hanging fruit that comes to the surface that can be implemented immediately - simply because we asked.

Ironically, many leaders and supervisors don't ask these kinds of questions because they don't "have the time." If staff leave, are frustrated, are not being used to their potential or could operate more leanly one cannot afford not to have these conversations. This is an investment very well spent.



TJ Addington of Addington Consulting has a passion to help individuals and organizations maximize their impact and go to the next level of effectiveness. He can be reached at tjaddington@gmail.com

                  Creating cultures of excellence




Thursday, March 28, 2019

Avoiding the activity trap


One of the most strategic things each of us can do - and insist from our staff is that we not fall into the activity trap. Simply put, the activity trap is the mistake of believing that activity is synonymous with results. Nothing could be further from the truth!

Think for a moment about people you know. Some of them seem to be always busy, but the results from their work are, well, meager. Others may or may not seem busy, but the results of their work are significant.

I have watched senior leaders and even CEOs fall into the activity trap, endlessly busy with "important things" but truly meager in terms of the results of their work. Often, if it were not for some good folks around them, they would be seen as the "emperor without clothes." Sometimes, they can fool outsiders who see the activity, but insiders have a hard time figuring out what they really produce.

What makes the difference between those who see meager results and those who see significant results?

The difference is that those who see the best results understand that activity does not equal results. Activity is simply being busy. But if that activity is not carefully focused on specific outcomes, one is simply left with activity.

General or unfocused activity yields general and unfocused results. Specific and focused activity will yield specific pre-determined outcomes that help the organization realize its objectives. In the first case, the activity is focused on activity, while in the second, the activity is focused on outcomes. It is a critical difference.

I am not indicating that those who live with unfocused activity are not doing good things. The question is whether the activity is focused on the good things that will yield the results they are after.

A problem with typical job descriptions is that they actually are a list of activities rather than a description of necessary results. That is why I believe it is far better to have job descriptions with Key Result Areas, which are the outcomes wanted for the position than to have a list of activities. With Key Result Areas, any activity included in the job is actually focused toward a few definable results that spell success for the job.

One of the ironies is that those who choose to do less often actually accomplish more because they are more focused than those running at a heavy pace.

To avoid the activity trap, we should be able to answer these questions:

Do I know what specific results I want from my work? For instance, I have five Key Result Areas that spell success for my work. Can you define what spells success for you?

Is my daily, weekly, and monthly activity focused on achieving the specific results I have identified?

Do I have a strategy for making sure I stay focused? After all, it is very easy to drift, and a strategy for staying focused is important.

If you are a supervisor, can your reports answer these questions?